Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. / Ásmundsdóttir, Ragnheiður Diljá; Hansen, Jakob; Fagernäs, Zandra; Troché, Gaudry; Olsen, Jesper V.; Saña Seguí, Maria; Welker, Frido.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Vol. 57, 104643, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ásmundsdóttir, RD, Hansen, J, Fagernäs, Z, Troché, G, Olsen, JV, Saña Seguí, M & Welker, F 2024, 'Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes', Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 57, 104643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643

APA

Ásmundsdóttir, R. D., Hansen, J., Fagernäs, Z., Troché, G., Olsen, J. V., Saña Seguí, M., & Welker, F. (2024). Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 57, [104643]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643

Vancouver

Ásmundsdóttir RD, Hansen J, Fagernäs Z, Troché G, Olsen JV, Saña Seguí M et al. Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2024;57. 104643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643

Author

Ásmundsdóttir, Ragnheiður Diljá ; Hansen, Jakob ; Fagernäs, Zandra ; Troché, Gaudry ; Olsen, Jesper V. ; Saña Seguí, Maria ; Welker, Frido. / Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. In: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2024 ; Vol. 57.

Bibtex

@article{8946b908bdbd4f66a721e400e8f1c4f7,
title = "Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes",
abstract = "Skeletal sample selection for evolutionary palaeoproteomic studies is currently based on the availability of material, without taking into account the influence of bone biology on the proteome composition of living bone. A prime example concerns the cortical and trabecular bone that is present simultaneously in many skeletal elements, including those recovered from archaeological sites. These two bone components are formed and maintained in different manners and at different rates. In palaeoproteomics there is currently no empirical data demonstrating differences in composition and/or preservation of cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Here we analyse pairs of cortical and trabecular bone from six Early Holocene ungulate rib specimens from the site of La Draga, Spain, using shotgun proteomics. We observe generally larger proteomes, a larger number of peptides, and lower rates of degradation, for the cortical bone samples compared to the trabecular bone samples. These results suggest that in degraded proteomic contexts, preference should be given to the sampling of cortical bone in order to maximise the retrieval of larger and better-preserved bone proteomes.",
keywords = "Bone turnover, Osteogenesis, Palaeoproteomics, Sampling ethics, Shotgun proteomics, Skeletal remains, ZooMS",
author = "{\'A}smundsd{\'o}ttir, {Ragnhei{\dh}ur Dilj{\'a}} and Jakob Hansen and Zandra Fagern{\"a}s and Gaudry Troch{\'e} and Olsen, {Jesper V.} and {Sa{\~n}a Segu{\'i}}, Maria and Frido Welker",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports",
issn = "2352-409X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes

AU - Ásmundsdóttir, Ragnheiður Diljá

AU - Hansen, Jakob

AU - Fagernäs, Zandra

AU - Troché, Gaudry

AU - Olsen, Jesper V.

AU - Saña Seguí, Maria

AU - Welker, Frido

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Skeletal sample selection for evolutionary palaeoproteomic studies is currently based on the availability of material, without taking into account the influence of bone biology on the proteome composition of living bone. A prime example concerns the cortical and trabecular bone that is present simultaneously in many skeletal elements, including those recovered from archaeological sites. These two bone components are formed and maintained in different manners and at different rates. In palaeoproteomics there is currently no empirical data demonstrating differences in composition and/or preservation of cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Here we analyse pairs of cortical and trabecular bone from six Early Holocene ungulate rib specimens from the site of La Draga, Spain, using shotgun proteomics. We observe generally larger proteomes, a larger number of peptides, and lower rates of degradation, for the cortical bone samples compared to the trabecular bone samples. These results suggest that in degraded proteomic contexts, preference should be given to the sampling of cortical bone in order to maximise the retrieval of larger and better-preserved bone proteomes.

AB - Skeletal sample selection for evolutionary palaeoproteomic studies is currently based on the availability of material, without taking into account the influence of bone biology on the proteome composition of living bone. A prime example concerns the cortical and trabecular bone that is present simultaneously in many skeletal elements, including those recovered from archaeological sites. These two bone components are formed and maintained in different manners and at different rates. In palaeoproteomics there is currently no empirical data demonstrating differences in composition and/or preservation of cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Here we analyse pairs of cortical and trabecular bone from six Early Holocene ungulate rib specimens from the site of La Draga, Spain, using shotgun proteomics. We observe generally larger proteomes, a larger number of peptides, and lower rates of degradation, for the cortical bone samples compared to the trabecular bone samples. These results suggest that in degraded proteomic contexts, preference should be given to the sampling of cortical bone in order to maximise the retrieval of larger and better-preserved bone proteomes.

KW - Bone turnover

KW - Osteogenesis

KW - Palaeoproteomics

KW - Sampling ethics

KW - Shotgun proteomics

KW - Skeletal remains

KW - ZooMS

U2 - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643

DO - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85196825979

VL - 57

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

SN - 2352-409X

M1 - 104643

ER -

ID: 397243002